Describe a Person Who Faced Difficulties but Succeeded
In short
“Describe a Person Who Faced Difficulties but Succeeded” is a common IELTS Speaking Part 2 cue card. You get 1 minute to prepare and should speak for 1–2 minutes, covering all four points below. This page gives you a Band 9 model answer, an idea map so you can make it your own, the Part 3 follow-up questions with answers, and the vocabulary examiners reward.
The task card
Describe a Person Who Faced Difficulties but Succeeded. You should say:
- •Who this person is
- •What difficulties they faced
- •What they achieved
- •And explain why you find their story impressive
Band 9 model answer
I want to talk about my uncle Karim, who came to this country at twenty-six with an engineering degree that nobody here would recognise, and who is now a senior structural engineer on some fairly significant projects. Getting from the first thing to the second took him the better part of a decade, and I don't think I appreciated how hard it was until I was old enough to ask him about it properly.
The difficulty wasn't really the language, though that was part of it. It was that his qualification simply didn't count. He'd spent four years training and had three years of experience, and on paper here he was unqualified. To get accredited he had to sit a set of professional exams, and to sit those he needed local work experience, and to get local work experience he needed the accreditation — which is about as circular a trap as you can design.
So what he did was take a job as a technician, well below his level, on a site where the work was physical and the pay was poor. He did that for four years. In the evenings he studied for the conversion exams, and he failed the first one, which he says was the lowest point — not the failure itself but realising how far he still had to go. He was thirty by then, with a young family, watching people he'd trained alongside back home moving into senior roles.
What he achieved in the end was full accreditation, and then a steady climb — and he now leads a team of eleven, including several engineers who arrived the same way he did. That last part is the bit he's proudest of, actually. He goes out of his way to hire people with unrecognised foreign qualifications, because he knows exactly what that trap costs and roughly how good those people usually are.
As for why I find it impressive — it's not really the success, if I'm honest. Plenty of people succeed. It's the patience. Four years of doing work you're overqualified for, without any guarantee it will ever pay off, requires a kind of stamina I'm not sure I have. There's no dramatic moment in the story, no single heroic decision; it's just showing up, over and over, for years.
And he's completely unromantic about it. When I once described him as an inspiration he laughed and said he was simply too stubborn to go home and admit he'd failed. I suspect that's not the whole truth, but I think there's something honest in it — a lot of what looks like courage from the outside is really just refusing to quit.
Make it your own: three angles
An immigrant or career-change story
Gives you a concrete, explainable obstacle rather than a vague struggle, and the timeline lets you use past perfect and narrative tenses naturally.
Someone who overcame illness or injury
Emotionally strong, but keep the medical detail light — the marks are in how they responded, not in the diagnosis.
A classmate or colleague who struggled academically
Lower drama but very usable, and it works well if you witnessed the whole thing yourself and can give specifics.
What the examiner is listening for
Narrative tenses are the whole game here: past simple for the events, past perfect for what had already happened, past continuous for the background. The trap is spending ninety seconds on the difficulty and ten on the success — the examiner needs BOTH, plus your reason for finding it impressive. A specific, unglamorous reason ('the patience, not the success') scores far higher than 'he never gave up'.
Part 1 warm-up questions
- Do you give up easily when something is hard?
- Who encourages you when things go wrong?
- Do you think failure teaches people anything useful?
- Is it important to praise children when they try hard?
Part 3 follow-up questions & answers
Why do some people give up more easily than others?
A lot of it comes down to whether they can afford to keep going — persistence is much easier with a financial cushion or a family who can support you, and we tend to mistake that advantage for character. Beyond that, people who've succeeded after struggling before have evidence that effort pays off, so they're willing to spend more of it. Someone whose effort has never been rewarded is being quite rational when they stop.
Is success mostly about hard work or luck?
Both, and I think the honest answer is that luck decides the ceiling and hard work decides whether you reach it. Where you were born, what your parents did, whether the right opportunity appeared at the right moment — none of that is earned. But luck rarely converts into anything without work behind it. The people I find least convincing are the ones who attribute everything to effort, because it usually means they haven't examined what they were given.
Should schools teach children how to handle failure?
I'd say it's one of the more useful things they could teach. At the moment a lot of schooling rewards getting it right first time, which quietly teaches children that difficulty means you're not suited to something. Letting them attempt things well above their level, fail, and continue would build a far more accurate picture of how learning actually works.
Do difficult experiences make people stronger?
Sometimes, but I'd resist the idea that they automatically do — that's a comfortable thing to believe from the outside. Hardship with some support and some prospect of an end can genuinely build resilience. Relentless hardship with no way out mostly just wears people down. The difference isn't the difficulty; it's whether there was anything holding the person up while it happened.
How do successful people usually describe their own success?
Often inaccurately, and I don't think it's dishonesty so much as memory. Looking back, the path tends to look more deliberate than it felt at the time, so people construct a story with a plan in it. There's also a social pressure to credit hard work rather than advantage, because that's the version people want to hear. My uncle saying he was just too stubborn to quit is probably closer to the truth than most.
Is society too focused on success?
I think it's focused on a very narrow definition of it — income, title, visibility — and that leaves a lot of genuinely valuable lives looking like failures. Someone who raised a family well or held a community together doesn't register on that scale at all. A broader definition wouldn't reduce ambition; it would just stop so many people feeling they'd fallen short of something they never actually wanted.
Can anyone succeed if they try hard enough?
No, and I think saying so does real harm. Effort is necessary but it isn't sufficient — structural barriers exist, and telling someone facing one that they simply need to try harder turns a systemic problem into a personal failing. What I would say is that almost nobody succeeds without effort, which is a different and much more defensible claim.
Useful vocabulary
| Word / phrase | Meaning |
|---|---|
| to face an uphill battle | to have a long, difficult struggle |
| against all odds | despite being very unlikely to succeed |
| to persevere | to keep going despite difficulty |
| a setback | something that delays or reverses progress |
| to start from scratch | to begin again from nothing |
| to pay off | to produce a good result eventually |
| stamina | the ability to sustain effort over a long time |
| overqualified | having more skill than the job requires |
| resilience | the ability to recover from difficulty |
| to stick it out | to continue despite wanting to stop |
More cue cards
Describe a Person You Admire
Preparing for the whole test, not just Speaking?
Practise Reading with unlimited AI-generated Cambridge-style passages and trap-level feedback, and check your Writing against the official criteria — free to start.