Some people feel that the private lives of celebrities should not be openly shared by the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
This IELTS Writing Task 2 answer was marked Band 7 on the four official criteria. All four criteria were marked at 7. The biggest single improvement: Use examples that directly address private-life disclosure: replace the Ronaldo and Messi example about professional inspiration with a concrete explanation of how publishing relationships, homes or health information harms celebrities.
How it was marked
| Criterion | Band | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Task Response | 7 | The essay presents a clear and consistent position in favour of privacy, expressed in "I believe that celebrities' private lives should largely remain private" and repeated in the conclusion. It addresses both sides, but the opposing argument about maintaining celebrities' "fame and influence" is only partly relevant and the main ideas are not fully developed with sufficiently direct examples. |
| Lexical Resource | 7 | The essay uses a good range of relevant vocabulary, including "invasion of privacy," "intimate details," "fundamental rights" and "misinformation," with generally appropriate style. However, some collocations are imprecise or unnatural, particularly "keeping public figures’ private lives open," "football environment" and "myriads of unfair judgments," and there is some repetition of "private lives" and "personal lives." |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 7 | The response demonstrates a useful range of complex structures, including the concessive opening "While this practice can reduce their influence on fans" and the participial clause "eventually negatively affecting their well-being." Grammar is generally accurate and meaning is clear, although the duplicated comma in "Moreover, , learning" is a noticeable punctuation error and some long sentences could be controlled more precisely. |
| Coherence & Cohesion | 7 | The response is logically organised into an introduction, a concession paragraph, a main argument paragraph and a conclusion, with clear progression from "Admittedly" to "Conversely" and "In conclusion". Referencing and paragraphing are generally effective, although the first body paragraph moves from private-life reporting to professional inspiration, which weakens the logical connection between its example and the question. |
The answer
A learner answer, not a model answer — study what the marks reward, don't copy it.
Corrections from the marking
keeping public figures’ private lives open can maintain their fame and influence among individuals
keeping public figures’ private lives in the public eye can maintain their fame and influence among their followers
“Keep private lives open” is not a natural collocation, and “followers” is more precise than the vague “individuals” in this context.
Moreover, , learning about celebrities’ professional experiences does not require the media to reveal intimate details of their personal lives.
Moreover, learning about celebrities’ professional experiences does not require the media to reveal intimate details of their personal lives.
The comma after “Moreover” is duplicated; an introductory linking adverb requires only one following comma.
exposing the personal routines of famous individuals can inspire young people
exposing the private lives of famous individuals can inspire young people
“Personal routines” refers mainly to repeated daily activities and is less precise than “private lives” for the idea being discussed.
How this answer could score higher
- Use examples that directly address private-life disclosure: replace the Ronaldo and Messi example about professional inspiration with a concrete explanation of how publishing relationships, homes or health information harms celebrities.
- Improve collocation accuracy by changing "keeping public figures’ private lives open," "football environment" and "myriads of unfair judgments" to more natural phrases such as "publicising aspects of public figures’ private lives," "the professional football world" and "countless unfair judgments."
- Proofread punctuation and sentence control, especially the duplicated comma in "Moreover, , learning," and then connect each sentence more explicitly to the central claim about privacy.
Other answers to this question
Write your own answer to this question
Is this your essay? Request removal. Essays are published without any name, email or account details.