Skip to content
IELTSbiz
Band 5 · 339 words · IELTS Writing Task 2

Artificial Intelligence and Employment Some people believe that the increasing use of artificial intelligence and machines will improve people's lives, while others are concerned about its consequences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This IELTS Writing Task 2 answer was marked Band 5 on the four official criteria. Its strongest criterion was Task Response (5.5); Coherence & Cohesion (5) held it back. The biggest single improvement: Develop each main idea with a clear explanation and specific consequence: expand "rapid results" into a concrete benefit such as faster medical diagnosis, and explain how it improves people's lives.

How it was marked

CriterionBandWhy
Task Response5.5The essay addresses both views through the claims that AI can provide "rapid results" and may cause "job loses", and it gives a clear opinion that employees' jobs are at risk. However, the ideas are only partly developed, with limited explanation of how AI improves life and an insufficiently developed solution for displaced workers.
Lexical Resource5The essay uses some relevant topic vocabulary, including "artificial intelligence", "home appliances", "repetitive actions" and "AI-driven robots", but many word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural. Word-form and spelling problems such as "believe" for the noun "belief", "job loses" and "sever" reduce precision and make the expression sound limited.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy5The writer attempts a range of structures, including relative clauses, conditionals and reason clauses, as in "since humans are more prone to error from repetitive actions", but grammatical errors are frequent throughout. Problems with agreement, verb forms, plurals, possessives, articles and sentence construction sometimes make the intended meaning difficult to follow.
Coherence & Cohesion5The response has a recognisable four-part structure, with separate paragraphs beginning "On the one hand" and "On the other hand", but progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear and ideas are repeated. Cohesive devices are used, although some links are awkward or mechanically inserted, such as "In this sense" and "Consequently" where the logical relationship is not fully clear.

The answer

A learner answer, not a model answer — study what the marks reward, don't copy it.

Certain individuals advocate artificial intelligence due to their believe that it will improve people's lives, while others maintain the believe that it might have severe consequences. From my perspective, I reckon that artificial intelligence might put employees's jobs at risk. On the one hand, advocates argue that artificial intelligence might enhance people's lives mainly because of its ability to form rapid and demanding solutions, help most societal people in making hard everyday choices, and it might help overcome life threatening situations. In other words, artificial intelligence is a resource of rapid results. For instance, AI is integrated in mostly all everyday resources such as cars and home appliances mostly due to the way it helps achieve rapid outcomes. From my standpoint, I'm certain that it might cause substantial effects to certain careers by easily doing their job. On the other hand, others and I are certain that artificial intelligence might overpower employees with simple jobs. In this sense, rapid growth of AI generates greater risk of job loses of those who practice automate jobs, since humans are more prone to error from repetitive actions. Consequently, artificial intelligence is take into consideration to decrease the number of mistakes that regular employees that potentially lead to cost loss. For instance, Amazon has replaced its coworkers that are responsible for packing with AI driven robots. In my opinion, Ai could potentially lead to the loss of certain low skilled people that might put their families and themselves at financial edge. From my perspective, I recommend that companies offer substituting jobs to coworkers that have been replaced by AI such as a supervising position to these robots due to their high expertise in the job. In conclusion, some people reckon that artificial intelligence have substantial benefits to the living quality of individuals. Whilst me and others are certain that it may encounter sever detrimental outcomes on certain jobs however such believe can be resolved by offering a supervising position to those who lost their jobs to prevent rapid incline in their financial life.

Corrections from the marking

  • due to their believe

    due to their belief

    "Believe" is a verb, whereas the noun needed after "their" is "belief".

  • maintain the believe

    maintain the belief

    "Believe" is a verb; the correct noun is "belief".

  • From my perspective, I reckon that artificial intelligence might put employees's jobs at risk.

    From my perspective, I reckon that artificial intelligence might put employees' jobs at risk.

    The plural possessive form of "employees" is "employees'", with the apostrophe placed after the plural s.

  • On the one hand, advocates argue that artificial intelligence might enhance people's lives mainly because of its ability to form rapid and demanding solutions, help most societal people in making hard everyday choices, and it might help overcome life threatening situations.

    On the one hand, advocates argue that artificial intelligence might enhance people's lives mainly because of its ability to form rapid and demanding solutions, help most societal people in making hard everyday choices, and overcome life-threatening situations.

    The three verbs after "its ability to" must be parallel, and the compound adjective "life-threatening" requires a hyphen.

  • form rapid and demanding solutions

    devise rapid and effective solutions

    "Form solutions" is a weak collocation, and solutions are normally described as "effective" rather than "demanding".

  • help most societal people in making hard everyday choices

    help most members of society make difficult everyday decisions

    "Societal people" is not a natural expression, and "members of society" and "decisions" are more precise choices.

  • a resource of rapid results

    a source of rapid results

    "A source of results" is the natural collocation; "a resource of results" is not idiomatic.

  • mostly all everyday resources such as cars and home appliances

    almost all everyday technologies, such as cars and home appliances

    "Everyday resources" is imprecise here because cars and appliances are technologies, while "almost all" is the natural expression.

How this answer could score higher

  1. Develop each main idea with a clear explanation and specific consequence: expand "rapid results" into a concrete benefit such as faster medical diagnosis, and explain how it improves people's lives.
  2. Prioritise grammatical accuracy in basic forms by correcting examples such as "their believe", "employees's jobs", "job loses" and "AI is take into consideration" before attempting more complex sentences.
  3. Improve paragraph focus and logical progression: keep the first body paragraph entirely about benefits, the second entirely about employment risks, and explain the proposed solution of retraining workers rather than merely mentioning "a supervising position".

Other answers to this question

Write your own answer to this question

Is this your essay? Request removal. Essays are published without any name, email or account details.

    Need help?